| JORDAN
POND RESTORATION STUDY
PHASE 2 – STORMWATER MANAGEMENT PLAN
SHREWSBURY, MASSACHUSETTS
EXECUTIVE SUMMARY
In our Phase 1 of the Jordan Pond Restoration
Study dated January 31, 2003, GZA
indicated that Jordan Pond is subject to significant loading
of sediments, nutrients, and
bacteria. Past and continuing inputs of these constituents
were found to be the primary
causes of the degradation of the pond – contributing
to poor water quality, excessive
growth of aquatic plants, algae blooms, and loss of depth
from the Pond. Testing and
modeling conducted as part of the Phase 1 study point to stormwater
runoff as the
primary source of on-going loading into the Pond.
Based on the findings and alternatives presented
in Phase 1 of the Restoration Study, the Town, in consultation
with the Jordan Pond Watershed Association, instructed GZA
to
pursue stormwater management as a means of reducing the loading
of sediment and
contaminates into the Pond and thereby slowing the further
degradation of the Pond. Inline stormwater treatment in the
form of modified manhole structures was recommended by GZA
as the preferred alternative. This Phase 2 study was then
executed by GZA to provide planning and preliminary design
guidance to the Town and Watershed Association for a future
implementation program.
Hydrodynamic separators within modified manholes
are currently among the most
advanced methods of stormwater best management practices (BMPs).
These devices
may be retrofitted into the existing stormwater drainage pipe
system. Sediment and
sorbed nutrients entering one of these devices are trapped
within the deep sump.
Floatable debris, as well as oil and grease, are also segregated
from the outflow and
retained in the structure. High flows into the unit are bypassed
directly to the outlet to
prevent upstream flooding and limit re-suspension of sediment
and contaminates.
Periodic cleaning of the devices with a vacuum truck removes
the sediment and
contaminates from the system and prevents them from ultimately
entering the Pond. A
number of manufacturers make proprietary systems, many of
which perform essentially
the same function. Properly sized and maintained, the manufacturers
of these devises
state that they can remove up to 80 percent or more of total
suspended solids (TSS) from stormwater runoff.
Six critical sub-basins have been identified
by GZA within the Jordan Pond watershed
where in-line stormwater treatment is believed to be both
desirable and feasible. These
sub-basins are primarily areas with significant coverage of
impervious surfaces such as
roadways, parking lots, or roof area. Sediments and contaminates
tend to accumulate in
these areas and then wash directly into the storm sewer system
and then quickly into the Pond. Also recommended is the treatment
of runoff from residential areas nearest to the Pond. In areas
outside of the six identified sub-basins, other management
strategies have been suggested.
Stormwater management through the installation
of in-line treatment devices is unlikely
to yield immediate, appreciable water quality improvements
in the condition of Jordan
Pond, but it is an important first step in addressing identified
sedimentation and water
quality problems in the Pond.
|